<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next Wave of Open Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.innocentive.com/2009/04/09/the-next-wave-of-open-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.innocentive.com/2009/04/09/the-next-wave-of-open-innovation/</link>
	<description>Highlighting Global Open Innovation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:56:18 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete mobile</title>
		<link>http://blog.innocentive.com/2009/04/09/the-next-wave-of-open-innovation/comment-page-1/#comment-9251</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete mobile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.innocentive.com/?p=236#comment-9251</guid>
		<description>Very promising contribution outlining the creation of &#039;solutions 2.0&#039; -
At one central point I see conflicting aims though: with workgroups and (open) community features, the fundamentally secret approaches of solvers would get compromised. How would the community design have to look like to incorporate these concerns that probably affect Solvers and Seekers alike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very promising contribution outlining the creation of &#8217;solutions 2.0&#8242; -<br />
At one central point I see conflicting aims though: with workgroups and (open) community features, the fundamentally secret approaches of solvers would get compromised. How would the community design have to look like to incorporate these concerns that probably affect Solvers and Seekers alike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

